Prediction of Methane Production From Dairy and Beef Cattle. 2007. J. Dairy Sci. 90:3456-3467
J.P. Goopy1, C. Chang² and N. Tomkins³
Abstract Accurate measurement techniques are needed for determining greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in order to improve GHG accounting estimates to IPCC Tiers 2 and 3 and enable the generation of carbon credits. Methane emissions from agriculture must be well defined, especially for ruminant product systems where national livestock inventories are generated. This review compares measurement techniques for determining methyl hydride production at different scales, ranging from in vitro studies to individual animal or herd measurements. Feed intake is a key driver of enteric methane production (EMP) and measurement of EMP in smallholder product systems faces many challenges, including marked heterogeneity in systems and feed base, too every bit strong seasonality in feed supply and quality in many areas of sub-Saharan Africa.
In vitro gas production studies provide a starting point for research into mitigation strategies, which tin exist farther examined in respiration chambers or ventilated hood systems. For making measurements under natural grazing weather condition, methods include the polytunnel, sulphur hexafluoride (SFhalf dozen) and open-path laser. Developing methodologies are briefly described: these include blood methane concentration, infrared thermography, pH and redox balance measurements, methanogen population estimations and indwelling rumen sensors.
Tabular array of contents:
five.1 Introduction
5.2 Indirect estimation
five.3 Direct measurement
5.4 Short-term measurement
5.5 Emerging and future technologies
Author-affiliations
References
5.one Introduction
Fermentation processes by rumen microbes outcome in the germination of reduced cofactors, which are regenerated by the synthesis of hydrogen (Htwo) (Hungate 1966). Accumulation of excessive amounts of Hii in the rumen negatively affects the fermentation rate and growth of some microbial consortia. Methanogens therefore reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) to marsh gas (CH4) and water (Hii0) thereby capturing available hydrogen (McAllister et al. 1996). It is predicted that full CH4 emissions from livestock in Africa will increase to 11.one mt year-1 past 2030, an increase of 42% over three decades (Herrero et al. 2008). Production increases and efficiencies in the livestock sector are seen equally complementary outcomes if enteric methanogenesis can be reduced. While mitigation strategies are focused on manipulation of nutritional factors and rumen function, animal convenance programmes for selecting highly efficient animals that produce less enteric CHfour might besides exist useful. Regardless of the mitigation strategy imposed, whatever reduction in enteric methane production (EMP) must exist quantified and for this to exist achieved, authentic baseline emissions information are essential.
This chapter reviews existing and developing methodologies for gathering accurate data on ruminant methyl hydride production under a wide range of product systems. The principles of using predictive algorithms based on dietary, animate being and management variables are considered here for modelling smallholder livestock emissions, only not in detail. Predictive models have been considered in detail elsewhere (Blaxter and Clapperton 1965; Kurihara et al. 1999; Ellis et al. 2007, 2008; Charmley et al. 2008; Yan et al. 2009). Major techniques are highlighted at dissimilar levels — in vitro, fauna, herd and subcontract scale — and their advantages and disadvantages, including implementation in do, are discussed. These methodologies tin can be used to support mitigation strategies or quantify total national livestock emissions.
v.2 Indirect estimation
v.2.1 In vitro incubation
The amount of gas released from the fermentation process and the buffering of volatile fat acids is related to the kinetics of fermentation of a known amount of feedstuff (Dijkstra et al. 2005). Several systems have been developed for measuring in vitro gas production, varying considerably in complication and composure. Menke et al. (1979) describes a manual method using gas tight syringes, which involves constant registering of the gas book produced. More recently others have described a system using pressure level transducers (Pell and Schofield 1993; Theodorou et al. 1994; Cone et al. 1996). Variants of this organisation are at present available as proprietary systems (RF, ANKOM Technology®) using radio frequency pressure level sensor modules, which communicate with a calculator interface and dedicated software to record gas force per unit area values.
The basic principle of the in vitro technique relies on the incubation of rumen inoculum with a feed substrate under an anaerobic environment in gas tight culture bottles. Gas accumulates throughout the fermentation process and a cumulative volume is recorded. Gas volume curves can be generated over fourth dimension. To gauge kinetic parameters of total gas production, gas production values are corrected for the amount of gas produced in a bare incubation and these values can be fitted with time using a not-linear curve plumbing fixtures procedure in GenStat (Payne et al. 2011) or other suitable software. Headspace gas samples are taken to analyse the gas compositions and determine actual CHfour concentrations, typically by gas chromatography. A 'quick and dirty' alternative is to introduce a strongly bones solution, such every bit NaOH into the vessel, which will cause the CO2 to enter solution. The remaining gas is assumed to exist CH4.
Gas is only i of the outputs of microbial fermentation, and the quality of the information derived tin can be improved by also because substrate disappearance and production of volatile fatty acids (VFAs) (Blümmel et al. 2005).
v.2.2 Estimation from diet
EMP tin be estimated from intake and diet quality (digestibility). A number of algorithms can be used to practise this, although estimates of emissions can vary by 35% or more for a particular diet (Tomkins et al. 2011). Diet quality can be inferred from assay of representative samples of the rations or pasture consumed, but where intake is not measured, estimation of EMP faces considerable challenges. Models which estimate intake based on diet quality or particular feed fractions assume ad libitum admission, and in situations where animals are corralled without access to feed overnight, the validity of this assumption is likely violated (Jamieson and Hodgson 1979; Hendricksen and Minson 1980). In such a case, intake can be inferred from energy requirement (Live Weight (LW) + Energy for: LW flux; maintenance + lactation and pregnancy + locomotion) using published estimates (such as National Research Council) to convert concrete values to energy values and then infer intake of the estimated diet. If this method is chosen, multiple measurements are required to capture changes in these parameters, likewise as seasonal influences on feed availability and quality. Where possible, estimates made using this methodology should be validated past measurements in respiratory chambers.
five.3 Direct measurement
v.three.1 Open-circuit respiration chambers
Models to estimate national and global CH4 emissions from sheep and cattle at farm level are mostly based on information of indirect calorimetric measurements (Johnson and Johnson 1995). Respiration chambers are used to measure CH4 at an individual fauna level. Their use is technically demanding, and simply a few animals tin be monitored at any i time (McGinn et al. 2008). However, these systems are capable of providing continuous and accurate data on air composition over an extended period of time.
Although the design of chambers varies, the basic principle remains the same. Sealed and environmentally controlled chambers are constructed to business firm test animals. All open-excursion chambers are characterized past an air inlet and exhaust, so animals exhale in a one-way stream of air passing through the sleeping accommodation space. Air can be pulled through each chamber and, by running intake and exhaust fans at different speeds, negative pressure can be generated within the chamber. This is to ensure that air is not lost from the bedroom (Turner and Thornton 1966). Still, CHfour can still be lost from chambers that are imperfectly sealed (down the concentration gradient), then gas recovery is an essential routine maintenance task. Thresholds for bedroom temperature (<27°C), relative humidity (<ninety%), CO2 concentration (<0.5%) and ventilation rate (250–260 L min-1) have been described (Pinares-Patiño et al. 2011), but may vary in practice. It is very important, still, to ensure that test animals remain in their thermo-neutral zone while being measured, or intake is likely to exist compromised. Some chambers may be fitted with air conditioning units, which provide a degree of dehumidification, and a ventilation system. This ensures that chambers tin exist maintained at abiding temperature (Klein and Wright 2006) or at near-ambience temperature to capture normal diurnal variance (Tomkins et al. 2011). Choices about temperature are governed by technical resources and experimental objectives. Feed bins and automated h2o systems may likewise be fitted with electronic scales and meters to monitor feed and water intake.
Alter in O2, CO2 and CHiv concentrations is measured past sampling incoming and outgoing air, using gas analysers, infrared photoacoustic monitors or gas chromatography systems (Klein and Wright 2006; Grainger et al. 2007; Goopy et al. 2014b). The other essential measurement is airflow, over a period of either 24 or 48 hours. The accuracy and long-term stability of the measurements are dependent on the sensitivity of the gas analysers used and the precision of their calibration. Chambers are directly calibrated by releasing a certain amount of standard gas of known concentration to estimate recovery values (Klein and Wright 2006). Measurement outcomes are likewise influenced by the ecology temperature, humidity, pressure level, incoming air composition and sleeping room volume. The larger the chamber the less sensitive the measurements are to spatial fluctuations, as the response time is dependent on the size of the chamber and the ventilation rate (Brown et al. 1984). The scale of the gas analysers must exist accurate and replicable for long-term utilise.
One constraint of this technique is that normal animal behaviour and move are restricted in the respiration chambers. Animals benefit from acclimatization in chambers prior to solitude and measurement, in order to minimize alterations in behaviour, such as decreased feed intake (McGinn et al. 2009). All the same, there is articulate testify that this will happen in a modest proportion of animals, regardless of training (Robinson et al. 2014) and this should be borne in heed when interpreting data. Using transparent structure material in sleeping room blueprint allows animals to have visual contact with the other housed animals.
At that place are high costs associated with the construction and maintenance of open up-circuit respiration chambers. The need for high functioning and sensitive gas analysers and menses meters must be considered in blueprint and construction. Only a few animals tin can be used for measurements within chambers at any i fourth dimension (Nay et al. 1994). Notwithstanding, respiration chambers are suitable for studying the differences between treatments for mitigation strategies, and continue to be regarded as the 'gold standard' for measuring individual emissions.
5.three.2 Ventilated hood organization
The ventilated hood organization is a simplification of the whole beast respiration chamber, as information technology measures the gas exchange from the head but, rather than the whole torso. Moreover, it is an improvement on confront masks equally used by Kempton et al. (1976), considering gas measurements tin be generated throughout the day and animals are able to admission nutrient and water.
Modern ventilated hood systems for methyl hydride measurements accept been used in Nippon, Thailand (Suzuki et al. 2007, 2008), USA (Place et al. 2011), Canada (Odongo et al. 2007) and Australia (Takahashi et al. 1999). Fernández et al. (2012) describes a mobile, open-circuit respiration system.
The ventilated hood system used by Suzuki et al. (2007, 2008) consists of a caput cage, the digestion trial pen, gas sampling and assay, behaviour monitoring and a data acquisition system. Similarly to whole animal chambers, information technology is equipped with a digestion pen for feed intake and excreta output measurements. An airtight caput cage is located in forepart of the digestion pen and is provided with a loose fitting sleeve to position the animal'due south head. Head boxes are provided with blowers, to move the main air stream from the inlet to the frazzle. Menstruum meters correct the air book for temperature, pressure and humidity. Air filters remove moisture and particles from the gas samples, which are sent to the gas analysers (Suzuki et al. 2007). The mobile organization of Fernández et al. (2012) contains a mask or a head hood connected to an open-circuit respiration arrangement, which is placed on a mobile cart.
The ventilated hood organisation is a suitable method under some circumstances, peculiarly where open-circuit chambers are not viable. A disquisitional limitation of the hood arrangement is that extensive training is absolutely essential to allow the test animals to become accustomed to the hood apparatus. Thus while it can exist used to assess potential of feeds, it is not suitable for screening large numbers of animals. A further consideration is that hoods capture but measurements of enteric methanogenesis and exclude the proportion in flatus.
5.3.3 Polytunnel
Polytunnels are an alternative to respiration chambers, and operation and measurements are somewhat simpler. Methane emissions from private or pocket-sized groups of animals can be acquired under some degree of grazing. This allows test animals to express normal grazing behaviour, including diet pick over the forages confined within the polytunnel space. They have been used in the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland to mensurate CHfour emissions from ruminants nether semi-normal grazing weather condition. Murray et al. (2001) reports CH4 emissions from sheep grazing two ryegrass pastures and a clover–perennial ryegrass mixed pasture using this methodology. Essentially polytunnels consist of ane large inflatable or tent blazon tunnel made of heavy duty polyethylene fitted with end walls and large diameter ports. Air is drawn through the internal space at speeds of upwards to one gthree s-1 (Lockyer and Jarvis 1995). In full general they are used where emissions from fresh forages are of interest because animals tin can be allowed to graze a bars area of known quality and quantity. When the available forage is depleted the tunnel is moved to a new patch.
Air menstruation charge per unit can be measured at the same interval as the CH4 or can be continuously sampled at the exhaust port (Lockyer 1997). Micropumps may be used to pass the exhausted air to a dedicated gas analyser or a gas chromatograph (GC) (Murray et al. 2001). Information from all sensors tin can be sent to a data logger, which captures flow charge per unit, humidity and temperature within the tunnel, and gas product from the livestock. Samples of the incoming and exhaust air can be taken every bit frequently as necessary, depending on the accuracy required. The samples can be either taken manually or by an automatic sampling and injection organisation.
The polytunnel system requires frequent calibration to assure a skillful recovery rate, which is performed using the aforementioned principle as the chamber technique. Methane measurements tin be nerveless over extended periods of time. Fluctuations occur due to changes in animal behaviour, position relative to the exhaust port, internal temperature, relative humidity and grazing pattern of the creature: eating, ruminating or resting (Lockyer and Jarvis 1995; Lockyer and Champion 2001). The polytunnel is suitable for measuring CHiv emissions under semi-normal grazing atmospheric condition. It has been reported that the polytunnel method gives xv% lower readings of CH4 concentration compared to the respiration chamber method, suggesting that animals actually consume less in the polytunnel. This requires further investigation. Recovery rate is high in both systems: 95.five–97.9% in polytunnels, compared to 89.2–96.7% in chambers (Murray et al. 1999). With an automatic system, measurements tin can be performed with high repeatability. The arrangement is portable and can be used on a number of pastures or browse shrubs, though once again its utility is limited by the inability to capture feed intake.
v.3.iv Sulphur hexafluoride tracer technique
The sulphur hexafluoride (SFhalf dozen) technique provides a direct measurement of the CH4 emission of individual animals. This technique can be performed under normal grazing conditions, but can also exist employed under more controlled conditions where intake is measured and/or regulated.
The SFsix principle relies on the insertion of a permeation tube with a predetermined release ratio of SF6 into the rumen, orally administered (Johnson et al. 1994). Air from around the animal's muzzle and mouth is drawn continuously into an evacuated canister connected to a halter fitted with a capillary tube around the neck. Johnson et al. (1994) provide a detailed description of the methodology.
The duration of collection of each sample is regulated by altering the length and/or diameter of the capillary tube (Johnson et al. 1994). Several modifications accept since been reported with specific applications (Goopy and Hegarty 2004; Grainger et al. 2007; Ramirez-Restrepo et al. 2010). Most recently Deighton et al. (2014) has described the use of an orifice plate menstruation restrictor which considerably reduces the mistake associated with sample collection and should be considered in preference to the traditional capillary tube menstruum restrictors. At completion of sample collection the canisters are pressurized with N2 prior to compositional assay by gas chromatography. Enteric CHfour production is estimated by multiplying the CH4/SF6 ratio by the known permeation tube release rate, corrected for actual elapsing of sample collection and background CHfour concentration (Williams et al. 2011), which is determined by sampling upwind ambient air concentration. Williams et al. (2011) emphasized the importance of correct measurement and reporting of the background concentrations, specially when the method is practical indoors. CH4 is lighter (sixteen g mol-one) than SFsix (146 g mol-1) and will therefore disperse and accumulate differently depending on ventilation, location of the animals and other building characteristics.
This method enables gas concentrations in exhaled air of individual animals to be sampled and takes into account the dilution factor related to air or head movement. The high inside- and between-animal variation is significant limitation of this method. Grainger et al. (2007) reported variation within animals betwixt days of 6.1% and a variation amongst animals of 19.7%. Pinares-Patiño et al. (2011) monitored sheep in respiration chambers simultaneously with the SFsix technique. They reported college within (ten two.5) and betwixt (10 two.9) animal variance compared to the bedroom technique, combined with a lower recovery rate (0.8±0.xv with SFhalf-dozen versus 0.ix±0.10 with chambers). These sources of variation need to exist taken into business relationship in order to determine the number of repeated measures necessary to ensure accurate results. Moate et al. (2015) describes the use of Michaelis–Menten kinetics to amend predict the belch rate of capsules, which should reduce error associated with estimating belch rates. Information technology should too prolong the useful life of experimental subjects through the improved predictability of belch rates over much longer intervals.
The SFsix technique allows animals to move and graze normally on exam pastures. This makes the method suitable for examining the effect of grazing management on CHfour emissions (Pinares-Patiño et al. 2007) but it does so at a cost. The SFvi method is less precise, less physically robust (high equipment failures) and more than labour intensive than respiration chamber measures.
v.3.5 Open-path laser
The use of open-path lasers combined with a micrometeorological dispersion method can now be used to measure enteric methane emissions from herds of animals. Information technology therefore facilitates whole-farm methane measurements beyond a number of pastures.
The open-path laser method for whole-farm methane measurements is already in use in Canada (McGinn 2006; Flesch et al. 2005, 2007), Commonwealth of australia (Loh et al. 2008; McGinn et al. 2008; Denmead 2008; Tomkins et al. 2011), New Zealand (Laubach and Kelliher 2005) and People's republic of china (Gao et al. 2010). Methane concentration measurements are performed using one or more tuneable infrared diode lasers mounted on a programmable and motorized scanning unit (Tomkins et al. 2011). The tuneable infrared diode light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation beams to a retro reflector along a directly path, which reflects the beam dorsum to a detector. The intensity of the received lite is an indicator of the CHfour concentration (ppm) along the path. In an optimal situation there should be at least one path for each predominant air current management: one path upwind (groundwork CHiv) and multiple paths downwind (CH4 emission) of the herd. This method assumes that the herd acts as a surface source or, when individual animals can be fitted with GPS collars, individual animals are treated equally point sources.
Regardless of application, the CH4 concentration is calculated every bit the ratio of the external absorption to internal reference-cell absorption of the infrared laser beam as it travels along the path (Flesch et al. 2004, 2005). Methane concentration and environmental indicators such equally atmospheric temperature, pressure, and wind direction and speed are continually measured and recorded using a weather station (Loh et al. 2008, 2009). Information — including GPS coordinates of the paddock or individual animals from a number of averaging time periods — tin be merged using statistical software. After integrating, WindTrax software (Thunder Beach Scientific, Nanaimo, Canada) uses a backward Langrangian Stochastic (bLS) model to simulate CH4 emissions (yard twenty-four hours-1 per brute), by computing the line boilerplate CHfour concentrations with atmospheric dispersion weather.
The information integrity of the open-path laser method is highly dependent on ecology factors and the location of exam animals. Flesch et al. (2007) described several criteria to determine data integrity using the open-path laser method. These criteria are based on wind turbulence statistics, light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation light intensity, R2 of a linear regression between received and reference waveforms, surface roughness, atmospheric stability and the source location (surface or indicate source). Invalid data tin be generated as a result of misalignment of the light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation, unfavourable wind directions, surface roughness or periods in which the atmospheric conditions (rain, fog, heat waves, etc.) are unsuitable for applying the model (Freibauer 2000; Laubach and Kelliher 2005; Loh et al. 2008). To optimize the positioning of the equipment, these meteorological and physical aspects of the experimental site must be taken into account (Flesch et al. 2007; Loh et al. 2008, 2009). Moreover, the measurement expanse is restricted by the length of the laser paths when using a surface source arroyo. Information technology is important to define the herd location, as uneven distribution of the herd results in miscalculations of the CHfour concentration. Tomkins et al. (2011), comparing open up-circuit respiration chambers with the open-path light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation technique, reported estimated CHfour emissions using the bLS dispersion model of 29.vii±3.70 grand kg-one dry out matter intake (DMI), compared to xxx.1±two.19 1000 kg-1 DMI measured using open-circuit respiration chambers.
The open-path laser method does not interfere with the normal grazing behaviour of the cattle and is non-invasive. Spatial variability is taken into account in these measurements, as the method can simulate gas fluxes over a big grazing area. Moreover, the tuneable diode laser is highly sensitive and has a fast response to changes in CH4 concentration, with detection limits at a calibration of parts per trillion (McGinn et al. 2006). The labour intensity is low, although the equipment requires continuous monitoring. This method is expensive, which reflects non only the requirement for sensitive and rapid-response instruments to analyse CHfour concentration, but also the requirement to capture micrometeorology data. Diurnal variations due to grazing and rumination pattern, pasture composition and individual variation need to be considered in planning experimental protocols to forestall over- or under- calculation of the total emission. Furthermore, DMI determination is not very accurate as this is based on predictive models using the relationship betwixt LW and LW gain, following supposition of the ARC (1980).
5.4 Short-term measurement
While most assessments of enteric methane emissions are focused on daily methane product (DMP), or the derivative, daily methane yield (MY), there is increasing impetus to estimate the emissions of large numbers of animals in their productive environs. This is driven both by the need for data to plant genetic parameters for DMP and to verify mitigation strategies or GHG inventories. This area is discussed just briefly hither, as there is currently limited scope for the application of these technologies in sub-Saharan Africa. The area has been ably reviewed by Hegarty (2013).
5.4.1 Greenfeed® emission monitoring apparatus
Greenfeed® is a patented device (Zimmerman & Zimmerman 2012) that measures and records short-term (iii–6 minute) CH4 emissions from individual cattle repeatedly over 24 hours past attracting animals to the unit of measurement using a 'allurement' of pelleted concentrate. By being available 24 hours per solar day potential sampling bias is reduced and the technique has been shown to provide comparable estimates to those produced both by respiratory chamber and SF6 techniques (Hammond et al. 2013). However, a pregnant limitation of the technique is the requirement to supply an 'attractant' to lure the animal to use the facility, consisting of up to 1 kg of concentrate pellets per twenty-four hour period. This volition certainly affect DMP and may also change volatile fatty acrid profiles or the overall digestibility of the diet. Attempts to use energy neutral attractants, such as water have proven equivocal (J Velazco, pers. comm.).
five.4.2 Portable accumulation chambers (PAC)
A PAC consists of a clear polycarbonate box of approximately 0.8m3, open at the bottom and sealed by achieving shut contact with flexible prophylactic matting. Methane production is measured past the increase in concentration that occurs while an animal is in the chamber for approximately ane hour. PACs were designed to screen large numbers of sheep, variously to identify potentially depression and high emitting individuals and to develop genetic parameter estimates in sheep populations. This technique initially showed close understanding with respiratory chamber measurements (Goopy et al. 2009; Goopy et al. 2011). Subsequent investigations demonstrated such measurements to be moderately repeatable in the field and to have potential for genetic screening of animals (Goopy et al. 2015). Longer-term comparisons of PAC measurements and respiratory chamber information, all the same, suggest that these two methods may be measuring quite different traits and further investigation is required earlier committing significant resource to PAC measurements (Robinson 2015).
These methods measure emissions over as curt menses, which can exist used to gauge daily methane production or relative methane emissions.
five.4.iii Application of CH4:CO2 ratio
Madsen et al. (2010) proposed using the ratio of CHiv:CO2 in exhaled jiff to assess enteric methane production in ruminants. This method requires knowledge about the intake, free energy content and heat increment of the ration consumed. Haque et al. (2014) applied this method, using a stock-still heat increment factor. Hellwing et al. (2013) regressed open-circuit chamber measurements of DMP in cattle against estimates calculated using CH4:CO2 ratios and establish them to exist simply moderately correlated (Rii = 0.4), which suggest this method is unsuitable for precision measurements.
5.iv.four Spot sampling with lasers
Spot measurements of methane in the air around cattle'due south mouths have been made using light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation devices to provide brusk-term estimates of enteric methane flux (Chagunda et al. 2009; Garnsworthy et al. 2012). These estimates are then scaled up to correspond DMP – requiring an impressive number of assumptions to exist met to satisfy such scaling. Chagunda and Yan (2011) have claimed correlations of 0.7 betwixt light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation and respiratory chamber measurements, simply this claim is based on the laser apparatus measuring methane concentrations in the outflow of the chambers, rather than from the animals themselves.
5.five Emerging and future technologies
5.5.1 Blood methane concentration
This methodology relies on enteric methane being absorbed across the rumen wall, transported in the blood stream to the pulmonary artery and respired by the lungs. The jugular (vein) gas turnover rate of enteric SF6, (introduced by an intraruminal bolus) and CH4 has been used to determine the respired concentrations and solubility of these gases (Ramirez-Restrepo et al. 2010). The solubility coefficients and CHiv concentrations are determined past gas chromatography, comparing the peak area of the sampled gases with standards. Variances in CH4 and SF6 blood concentrations may exist related to the methodology, or may occur because these gases are not equally re-absorbed. This requires further investigation. Sampling can be logistically challenging and labour intensive and it is important to recognize that this method provides little more than a 'snapshot' of methane concentration at fourth dimension of sampling.
5.5.two Infrared thermography
Montanholi et al. (2008) have examined the use of infrared thermography as an indicator for heat and methane product in dairy cattle. No direct human relationship was reported, nonetheless, between temperature in any specific part of the body and methyl hydride production.
v.5.3 Intraruminal telemetry
The employ of a rumen bolus to measure methane in the liquid phase is logistically possible and pocket-sized changes (<50 mmol Fifty-1) in CH4 concentrations could exist detectable (Gibbs 2008). Low pH and redox potential have been correlated with decreased CHiv concentrations, and a pH and redox sensor has been developed to suit a rumen bolus past eCow Electronic Cow Management at the University of Exeter, UK (world wide web.ecow.co.uk). This technology is still in its exploratory stages but the application of a rumen bolus to measure CH4 in the rumen headspace has been patented (McSweeney pers. comm.) and could theoretically provide accurate CHiv concentration estimates for large numbers of free grazing animals.
5.5.4 Quantitative molecular biological science
Gibbs (2008) examined the correlation between the numbers of methanogens and CH4 production in short time intervals. Results from real-fourth dimension polymerase chain reaction (PCR) suggest that increased CH4 product is related to increased methanogen metabolic activity rather than increased population size.
Summary
EMP is a complex trait, involving beast physiology and behaviour, constitute factors and animal direction. Although there are many techniques available to approximate EMP, all have limitations. The appropriateness of a technique is strongly influenced by its intended purpose and the degree of precision required. Information technology is important to recognize that while more sophisticated in vitro techniques can provide robust information well-nigh the fermentative, and hence, methanogenic potential of feeds, they exercise not truly stand for in vivo fermentation, nor do they account for feed intake, and will be of limited predictive utilise for animals grazing heterogeneous pastures. If intake is unknown it will diminish the utility of established models, particularly when assumptions regarding ad libitum intake are violated. Lasers, infrared and SF6 techniques tin can all be used to measure out EMP of animals at pasture. However, all are technically captious and in situations where intake is unknown, cannot be used to determine emissions intensity. Respiration chambers, while requiring significant majuscule to construct and technical skill to operate, provide precise and accurate measurements of EMP on known feed intake. Whilst at that place are justified criticisms surrounding reproducibility of EMP at pasture and evidence of changed feeding behaviour in some cases, respiration chambers remain the nigh accurate method of assessing EMP in individual animals.
¹John P. Goopy. International Livestock Research Institute. Nairobi, Republic of kenya. e-mail: j.goopy@cgiar.org
²Wageningen University, Brute Nutrition Group, the netherlands
³CSIRO, Livestock Industries, Queensland 4811, Australia
References
ARC (1980) The nutrient requirements of ruminant livestock. Australian Research Council, CAB International, Wallingford, UK
Berndt A, Boland TM, Deighton MH, Gere JI, Grainger C, Hegarty RS, Iwaasa AD, Koolaard JP, Lasse KR, Luo D, Martin RJ, Martin C, Moate PJ, Molano M, Pinares-Patiño C, Ribaux Be, Swainson NM, WAghorn GC, Williams SRO (2014) Guidelines for employ of sulphur hexafluoride (SF half dozen) tracer technique to mensurate enteric methyl hydride emissions from ruminants. G. G. Lambert, ed. New Zealand Agronomical Greenhouse Gas Inquiry Centre, New Zealand. www.globalresearchalliance.org/app/uploads/2012/03/SF6-Guidelines-all-chapters-web.pdf. Accessed 15 March 2015
Blaxter KL, Clapperton JL (1965) Prediction of the amount of marsh gas produced by ruminants. Brit J Nutr 19:511–22
Blümmel Yard, Givens DI, Moss AR (2005) Comparison of marsh gas produced by harbinger fed sheep in open-circuit respiration with methane predicted by fermentation characteristics measured past an in vitro gas process. Anim Feed Sci Tech 123–124(Part 1):379–90
Brown D, Cole TJ, Dauncey MJ, Marrs RW, Murgatroyd PR (1984) Analysis of gaseous exchange in open up-excursion indirect calorimetry. Med Biol Eng Comput 22:333–338
Chagunda MGG, Ross D, Roberts DJ (2009) On the use of a laser methane detector in dairy cows. Comput Electron Agr 68:157–threescore
Chagunda MGG, Yan T (2011) Practise methane measurements from a light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation detector and an indirect open up-excursion respiration calorimetric chamber concur sufficiently closely? Anim Feed Sci Tech 165:8–14
Charmley E, Stephens ML, Kennedy PM (2008) Predicting livestock productivity and methane emissions in northern Commonwealth of australia: development of a bio-economical modelling arroyo. Aust J Exp Agr 48:109–113
Cone JW, Gelder AH van, Visscher GJW, Oudshoorn 50 (1996) Influence of rumen fluid substrate concentration on fermentation kinetics measured with a fully automated time related gas product apparatus. Anim Feed Sci Tech 61:113–128
Deighton MH, Williams SRO, Hannah MC, Eckard RJ, Boland TM, Wales WJ, Moate PJ (2014) A modified sulphur hexafluoride tracer technique enables accurate decision of enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Anim Feed Sci Tech 197:47–63
Denmead OT (2008) Approaches to measuring fluxes of marsh gas and nitrous oxide between landscapes and the atmosphere. Plant Soil 309:5–24
Dijkstra J, Kebreab E, Bannink A, French republic J, López S (2005) Application of the gas product technique to feed evaluation systems for ruminants. Anim Feed Sci Tech 123–124:561–578
Ellis JL, Dijkstra J, Kebreab E, Bannink A, Odongo NE, McBride BW, French republic J (2008) Modelling beast systems paper: aspects of rumen microbiology central to mechanistic modelling of methane product in cattle. J Agr Sci 146:213–233
Ellis JL, Kebreab Eastward, Odongo NE, McBride BW, Okine EK, France J (2007) Prediction of methane production from dairy and beefiness cattle. J Dairy Sci ninety:3456–3467
Fernández C, López MC, Lachica One thousand (2012) Clarification and function of a mobile open-circuit respirometry organisation to measure gas commutation in minor ruminants. Anim Feed Sci Tech 172:242–246
Flesch TK, Wilson JD, Harper LA, Crenna BP (2005) Estimating gas emission from a farm using an inverse dispersion technique. Atmos Environ 39:4863–4874
Flesch TK, Wilson JD, Harper LA, Crenna BP, Sharpe RR (2004) Deducing basis-to-air emissions from observed trace gas concentrations: a field trial. J Appl Meteorol 43:487–502
Flesch TK, Wilson JD, Harper LA, Todd RW, Cole NA (2007) Determining ammonia emissions from a cattle feedlot with an inverse dispersion technique. Agr Wood Meteorol 144:139–155
Freibauer A (2000) New arroyo to an inventory of North2O and CH4 emissions from agriculture in Western Europe. Kluwer Bookish Publishers, Dordrecht–Boston–London.
Gao Z, Desjardins RL, Flesch TK (2010) Assessment of the dubiety of using an inverse-dispersion technique to measure out methane emissions from animals in a befouled and in a small pen. Atmos Environ 44:3128–3134
Garnsworthy PC, Craigon J, Hernandez-Medrano JH, Saunders N (2012) On-subcontract marsh gas measurements during milking correlate with total methane production by individual dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 95:3166–80
Gibbs J (2008) Novel methyl hydride assessment in ruminants. Final Report for Projection Code: CC MAF POL_2008-37. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Government of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand http://maxa.maf.govt.nz/climatechange/slm/grants/research/2007-08/2008-37-summary.htm Accessed March 15 2015
Goopy JP, Donaldson A, Hegarty R, Vercoe PE, Haynes F, Barnett 1000, Oddy VH (2014b) Low-marsh gas yield sheep have smaller rumens and shorter rumen retention time. Brit J Nutr 111:578–85
Goopy J, Hegarty R (2004) Repeatability of methane production in cattle fed concentrate and fodder diets. J Anim Feed Sci xiii:75–viii
Goopy J, Hegarty R, Robinson D (2009) Two hr chamber measurement provides a useful gauge of daily methane product in sheep. In: Ruminant physiology: digestion, metabolism and effects of nutrition on reproduction and welfare. Proceedings of the XIth International Symposium on Ruminant Physiology, Clermont-Ferrand, French republic half dozen–9 Sept 2009, p. 190. Wageningen Academic Pub, The Netherlands
Goopy J, Robinson D, Woodgate R, Donaldson A, Oddy H, Vercoe P, Hegarty R (2015) Estimates of repeatability and heritability of methane product in sheep using portable accumulation chambers. Anim Prod Sci http://dx.doi.org/ten.1071/AN13370
Goopy JP, Woodgate R, Donaldson A, Robinson DL, Hegarty RS (2011) Validation of a short-term methane measurement using portable static chambers to estimate daily marsh gas production in sheep. Anim Feed Sci Tech 166–167:219–26
Grainger C, Clarke T, McGinn SM, Auldist MJ, Beauchemin KA, Hannah MC, Waghorn GC, Clark H, Eckard RJ (2007) Methyl hydride Emissions from Dairy Cows Measured Using the Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) Tracer and Chamber Techniques. J Dairy Sci 90:2755–2766
Grainger C, Williams R, Clarke T, Wright ADG, Eckard RJ (2010) Supplementation with whole cottonseed causes longterm reduction of methane emissions from lactating dairy cows offered a forage and cereal grain diet. J Dairy Sci 93:2612–2619
Hammond Grand, Humphries D, Crompton Fifty, Kirton P, Green C, Reynolds C (2013) Methane emissions from growing dairy heifers estimated using an automated caput chamber (GreenFeed) compared to respiration chambers or SF6 techniques. Adv Anim Biosci 4:391
Haque MN, Cornou C, Madsen J (2014) Estimation of marsh gas emission using the COtwo method from dairy cows fed concentrate with different sugar compositions in automatic milking arrangement. Livest Sci 164:57–66
Hegarty RS (2013) Applicability of short-term emission measurements for on-farm quantification of enteric methyl hydride. Fauna 7:401–8
Hellwing A, Lund P, Madsen J, Weisberg MR (2013) Comparison of enteric methane production from the CHiv/CO2 ratio and measured in respiration chambers. Adv Anim Biosci 4:557
Hendricksen R, Minson DJ (1980) The feed intake and grazing behaviour of cattle grazing a crop of Lablab purpureus cv. Rongai. J Agr Sci 95:547–54
Herrero M, Thornton PK, Kruska R, Reid RS (2008) Systems dynamics and the spatial distribution of methyl hydride emissions from African domestic ruminants to 2030. Agr Ecosyst Environ 126:122–37
Hungate RE (1966) The rumen and its microbes. Academic Press, New York.
Jamieson WS, Hodgson J (1979) The effects of variation in sward characteristics upon the ingestive behaviour and herbage intake of calves and lambs under a continuous stocking management. Grass Forage Sci 34:273–82
Johnson K, Huyler Chiliad, Westberg H, Lamb B, Zimmerman P (1994) Measurement of methane emissions from ruminant livestock using a SF6 tracer technique. Envir Sci Tech 28:359–362
Johnson KA, Johnson DE (1995) Methane emissions from cattle. J Anim Sci 73:2483–2492
Kempton T, Murray R, Leng R (1976) Methane production and digestibility measures in the grey kangaroo and sheep. Aust J Biol Sci 29:209–214
Klein L, Wright ADG (2006) Construction and operation of open-circuit methane chambers for minor ruminants. Aust J Exp Agr 46:1257–1262
Kurihara M, Magner T, Hunter RA, McCrabb GJ (1999) Methane production and energy partition of cattle in the tropics. Brit J Nutr 81:227–234
Laubach J, Kelliher JM (2005) Methyl hydride emissions from dairy cows: comparing open-path laser measurements to profile-based techniques. Agr Forest Meteorol 135:340–345
Lockyer DR (1997) Marsh gas emission from grazing sheep and calves. Agr Ecosyst Environ 66:xi–18
Lockyer DR, Champion RA (2001) Methane production in sheep in relation to temporal changes in grazing behavior. Agr Ecosyst Environ 86:237–246
Lockyer DR, Jarvis SC (1995) The measurement of methane losses from grazing animals. Environ Pollut ninety:383–390
Loh, Z, Chen D, Bai M, Naylor T, Griffith D, Hill J, Denmead T, McGinn S, Edis R (2008) Measurement of greenhouse gas emissions from Australian feedlot beef production using open-path spectroscopy and atmospheric dispersion modelling. Aust J Exp Agr 48:244–247
Loh, Z, Leuning R, Zegelin South, Etheridge D, Bai Yard, Naylor T, Griffith D (2009) Testing Lagrangian atmospheric dispersion modeling to monitor CO2 and CH4 leakage from geosequestration. Atmos Environ 43:2602–2611
Madsen J, Bjerg BS, Hvelplund T, Weisbjerg MR, Lund P (2010) Marsh gas and carbon dioxide ratio in excreted air for quantification of the methyl hydride production from ruminants. Livest Sci 129:223–seven
McAllister TA, Okine EK, Mathison GW, Cheng KJ (1996) Dietary, environmental and microbiological aspects of methane production in ruminants. Can J Anim Sci 76:231–243
McGinn SM (2006) Measuring greenhouse gas emissions from point sources in agriculture. Tin J Soil Sci 86:355–371
McGinn SM, Beauchemin KA, Flesch TK, Coates T (2009) Operation of a dispersion model to estimate methane loss from cattle in pens. J Environ Qual 38:1796–1802
McGinn SM, Chen D, Loh Z, Colina J, Beauchemin KA, Denmead OT (2008) Methane emissions from feedlot cattle in Australia and Canada. Aust J Exp Agr 48:183–185
McGinn SM, Flesch TK, Harper LA, Beauchemin KA (2006) An approach for measuring methane emissions from whole farms. J Environ Qual 35:fourteen–20
Menke KH, Raab L, Salewski A, Steingass H, Fritz D, Schneider West (1979) The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feeding stuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. J Agr Sci 93:217–222
Moate PJ, Deighton MH, Ribaux BE, Hannah MC, Wales WJ, Williams SRO (2015) Michaelis–Menten kinetics predict the rate of SFsix release from permeation tubes used to gauge methane emissions from ruminants. Anim Feed Sci Tech 200:47–56
Montanholi YR, Odongo NE, Swanson KC, Schenkel FS, McBride BW, Miller SP (2008) Application of infrared thermography as an indicator of heat and methane production and its use in the study of skin temperature in response to physiological events in dairy cattle (Bos taurus). J Therm Biol 33:468–475
Murray PJ, Gill Due east, Balsdon SL, Jarvis SC (2001) A comparing of methane emissions from sheep grazing pastures with different direction intensities. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 60:93–97
Murray PJ, Moss A, Lockyer DR, Jarvis SC (1999) A comparison of systems for measuring methane emissions from sheep. J Agr Sci 133:439–444
Nay SM, Mattson KG, Bormann BT (1994) Biases of chamber methods for measuring soil COtwo efflux demonstrated with a laboratory apparatus. Environmental 75:2460–2463
Odongo NE, Alzahal O, Las JE, Kramer A, Kerrigan B, Kebreab E, France J, McBride BW (2007) Development of a mobile open up-excursion ventilated hood system for measuring real-fourth dimension gaseous emissions in cattle. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.
Payne RW, Murray DA, Harding SA (2011) An introduction to the GenStat Control Language (14th Edition). VSN International, Hemel Hempstead, UK
Pell AN, Schofield P (1993) Computerized monitoring of gas production to measure forage digestion in vitro. J Dairy Sci 76:1063–1073
Pinares C, Waghorn G (2014) Technical Manual on Respiration Bedchamber Designs. New Zealand Ministry building of Agronomics and Forestry, Wellington NZ http://world wide web.globalresearchalliance.org/app/uploads/2012/03/GRA-MAN-Facility-BestPract-2012-Terminal.pdf Acccessed March 15, 2015
Pinares-Patiño CS, Hr PD, Jouany JP, Martin C (2007) Furnishings of stocking rate on methane and carbon dioxide emissions from grazing cattle. Agr Ecosyst Environ 121:30–46
Pinares-Patiño CS, Lassey KR, Martin RJ, Molano G, Fernandez 1000, MacLean S, Sandoval E, Luo D, Clark H (2011) Assessment of the sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer technique using respiration chambers for estimation of methyl hydride emissions from sheep. Anim Feed Sci Tech 166:201–209
Place SE, Pan Y, Zhao Y, Mitloehner FM (2011) Construction and functioning of a ventilated hood arrangement for measuring greenhouse gas and volatile organic compound emissions from cattle. Animal i:433–446
Ramirez-Restrepo CA, Barr TN, Marriner A, López-Villalobos North, McWilliam EL, Lassey KR, Clark H (2010) Effects of grazing willow fodder blocks upon methane production and blood composition in young sheep. Anim Feed Sci Tech 155:33–43
Robinson D, Goopy J, Donaldson A, Woodgate R, Oddy 5, Hegarty R (2014) Sire and liveweight impact feed intake and marsh gas emissions of sheep confined in respiration chambers. Creature viii:1935–1944
Robinson DL, Goopy JP, Hegarty RS, Oddy VH (2015) Comparison of repeated measurements of CH4 production in sheep over 5 years and a range of measurement protocols. J Anim Sci submitted
Suzuki T, McCrabb GJ, Nishida T, Indramanee Due south, Kurihara Chiliad (2007) Construction and performance of ventilated hood-type respiration calorimeters for in vivo measurement of methyl hydride product and energy partition in ruminants. Springer, The Netherlands
Suzuki T, Phaowphaisal I, Pholson P, Narmsilee R, Indramanee Due south, Nitipot T, Haokaur A, Sommar K, Khotprom North, Panichpol V, Nishida T (2008) In vivo nutritive value of pangola grass (Digitaria eriantha) hay past a novel indirect calorimeter with a ventilated hood in Thailand. Jarq-Jpn Agr Res Q 42:123–129
Takahashi J, Chaudhry Every bit, Beneke RG, Immature BA (1999) An open-circuit hood system for gaseous substitution measurements in pocket-size ruminants. Pocket-sized Ruminant Res 32:31–36
Theodorou MK, Williams BA, Dhanoa MS, McAllan AB, France J (1994) A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Anim Feed Sci Tech 48:185–197
Tomkins NW, McGinn SM, Turner DA, Charmley E (2011) Comparing of open-circuit respiration chambers with a micrometeorological method for determining methane emissions from beefiness cattle grazing a tropical pasture. Anim Feed Sci Tech 166-167:240–247
Turner HG, Thornton RF (1966) A respiration bedchamber for cattle. Aust Soc Anim Prod half-dozen:413–419
Williams SRO, Moate PJ, Hannah MC, Ribaux BE, Wales WJ, Eckard RJ (2011) Groundwork matters with the SFhalf-dozen tracer method for estimating enteric methane emissions from dairy cows: A critical evaluation of the SF6 procedure. Anim Feed Sci Tech170:265–276
Yan T, Porter MG, Mayne CS (2009) Prediction of methane emission from beef cattle using information measured in indirect open-circuit respiration calorimeters. Animal 3:1455–1462
Zimmerman PR, Zimmerman RS (2012) Method and system for monitoring and reducing ruminant methane production. United states Patent number US20090288606 A1
Source: https://samples.ccafs.cgiar.org/measurement-methods/chapter-5-a-comparison-of-methodologies-for-measuring-methane-emissions-from-ruminants/
0 Response to "Prediction of Methane Production From Dairy and Beef Cattle. 2007. J. Dairy Sci. 90:3456-3467"
Postar um comentário